Recently Anthony has decided to post more of his ideas half-baked. Rob’s decided to leave his in the oven a bit longer.

I like the gesture-response model of thought: I latch on to an idea which is interesting and tease at its flaws, which leads to another interesting (but flawed) idea.

Your Myers-Briggs doesn’t dictate your opinion of the new White Book, but I think that its interesting to consider that your inclinations may affect your view: you are not a purely rational being; you would not be able to function if you were.

Thinking about standards a bit more, most standards are a mix of de facto and de jure. I wonder if there is a good rule of thumb for getting the mixture right.